Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 61-88

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 61...
... The 2020–2025 Transportation System Resilience Research Roadmap P A R T   3
From page 62...
... 62 Contents 63 Introduction 72 Analysis of Recommended Projects 75 Recommended Roadmap of 2020–2025 Research Projects
From page 63...
... 63   The 2020–2025 Transportation System Research Roadmap presents the results of a 3-year effort to gather and prioritize critical resilience research needs gleaned from a diverse set of transportation policy makers, executives, professionals, and researchers. The roadmap supports a mechanism by which the transportation community can work towards a consensus concerning those projects that will significantly advance the understanding, policy, and practice of transportation resilience.
From page 64...
... 64 Transportation System Resilience: Research Roadmap and White Papers and plan for responses to natural and human-caused disasters, including near- and long-term climate change effects on sea-level rise, droughts, forest fires, and heatwaves. Transportation agencies working across all modes continue to grapple with the dawning realization that they cannot currently plan, build, or operate their respective infrastructures to achieve and maintain the degree of resilient service expected and demanded by society and its elected representatives.
From page 65...
... Introduction 65   12. What are the best practices, how can they be shared, and what role should the public sector play in overseeing and enhancing cybersecurity?
From page 66...
... 66 Transportation System Resilience: Research Roadmap and White Papers 2. The accumulated research needs collected in Step 1 were analyzed and classified using four standard industry classification frameworks; 3.
From page 67...
... Introduction 67   Special Events The research team understood that resilience in transportation involves many constituencies other that state DOTs. Consequently, the team sought out and attended or participated in the following events where resilience research needs were generated: • The State of Resilience: A Leadership Forum and Community Workshop, sponsored by the Resilient America Roundtable (June 2016)
From page 68...
... 68 Transportation System Resilience: Research Roadmap and White Papers 2018 Transportation RISE The Transportation Resilience Innovations Summit and Exchange (RISE) conference was a gathering of transportation professionals and executives that provided an opportunity to share experiences and discuss future directions in resilience and move to institutionalize its concepts.
From page 69...
... Introduction 69   In total, more than 180 specific needs were identified from nine source categories. This set of needs was then community rated and ranked to determine the top 125 high-interest research needs in 10 subject matter areas: emergency management, asset management, design for resilience, community resilience, cyber resilience, infrastructure interdependencies, performance measures, economics of resilience, human and social factors, and risk management.
From page 70...
... 70 Transportation System Resilience: Research Roadmap and White Papers results need to be viewed with some caution. However, their ratings provide an indication of higher and lower topics of interest, particularly within the AASHTO community.
From page 71...
... Introduction 71   Table 3-3. (Continued)
From page 72...
... 72 Table 3-4 presents the research team's consensus compilation of the 26 Roadmap Projects recommended for the period 2020–2025. The final section in Part 3 presents the entire Roadmap detail for the recommended projects.
From page 73...
... Analysis of Recommended Projects 73   Item No. Title Rating Rank 1 DR-05 Integrating Resilience into Transportation Project Development 3.91 1 2 ER-02 Economic Benefits from Making Investments in Resilient Transportation Assets 3.75 2 3 DR-04 Design Guidance and Standards for Resilience 3.72 3 4 AM-01 Assessing and Managing the Vulnerability of Transportation Assets 3.71 4 5 AM-03 Incorporating Resilience in National Programs 3.68 5 6 EM-05 Streamlining the Damage Assessment Process 3.53 6 7 AM-02 Funding and Financing Resilience Adaptation 3.48 7 8 DR-01 Using Improved Hydrological Forecasting to Improve Transportation Resilience 3.44 8 9 PM-01 Resilience Performance Measures: A Quantitative Approach 3.36 9 10 CR-02 Cyber Risk Transfer Strategies 3.30 10 11 II-02 Transportation Infrastructure Interdependencies Risk Analysis and Modeling 3.24 11 12 CO-02 Resiliency Knowledge Base 3.21 12 13 EM-07 Effective Practices in Extreme Weather Response 3.18 13 14 II-01 Maintaining Resilience in a Multi-modal Transportation System 3.16 14 15 HF-01 Building a Resilient Work Force in State DOTs 3.15 15 16 AM-04 Assessing Resilience Frameworks 3.09 16 17 PM-03 Frameworks for Measuring Transportation Resilience 3.06 17 18 CO-05 Organizational Resiliency: Moving from Recovery to Retrenchment 3.06 17 19 CR-04 Assessing the Resilience of GPS-based Applications in Transportation 3.03 19 20 EM-02 New Technologies for Comprehensive Debris Management 3.03 19 21 EM-10 Emergency Project Contracting Guidelines 3.03 19 22 CR-05 Deploying the NIST Cybersecurity Framework in State DOTs 3.03 19 23 EM-03 Multi-Agency Emergency Preparedness 3.03 19 24 RM-01 A New Tool Assessing the Value of Resiliency Alternatives by State DOTs 3.03 19 25 EM-08 Emergency Management Training for Transportation Workers 3.00 25 26 CO-03 Restoring Access: Post-disaster Transportation Equity 3.00 25 Table 3-4.
From page 74...
... 74 Transportation System Resilience: Research Roadmap and White Papers Topic Count Percentage Policy, Rules, Process, and Funding 8 31% Tools and Technical Systems 6 23% Institutional Focus 5 19% Community Engagement 5 19% Investing in Innovation 1 4% Widespread Deployment 1 4% Total 26 100% Table 3-6. Top-ranked projects by topic.
From page 75...
... 75   This section contains the 5-year roadmap of recommended research projects as developed by the research team in collaboration with the project panel and transportation community. The family of 26 projects represents a potential program investment ranging from $10,750,000– $16,750,000.
From page 76...
... 76 Transportation System Resilience: Research Roadmap and White Papers Topic Policy, Rules, Process, and Funding Tools and Technical Systems Institutional Focus Community Engagement Investing in Innovation Widespread Deployment Table 3-10. Project subject areas.
From page 77...
... Recommended Roadmap of 2020–2025 Research Projects 77   Economic Benefits from Making Investments in Resilient Transportation Assets Background: News stories have identified the benefits of improved building codes in relation to reduced impacts from Hurricane Irma, and identified how communications recovered quickly in most areas in Houston in the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey. However, few financial and economic benefits from transportation investments that foster resilience have been documented.
From page 78...
... 78 Transportation System Resilience: Research Roadmap and White Papers understanding of how these extremes create short- and long-term impacts on their transportation assets they are recognizing a need to develop, share, and align adaptation and mitigation strategies that will work. A useful tool set and effective practices would assist transportation leaders on this journey to resilience.
From page 79...
... Recommended Roadmap of 2020–2025 Research Projects 79   Funding and Financing Resilience Adaptation Background: Transportation agencies are inundated with a continuing stream of federal, state, and local requirements that demand new or different approaches to incorporating them in their assets and programs. Many of these requirements can assist agencies in achieving a longterm resilience of their assets.
From page 80...
... 80 Transportation System Resilience: Research Roadmap and White Papers Objectives: The purpose of this research is to: 1. Survey measures currently used; 2.
From page 81...
... Recommended Roadmap of 2020–2025 Research Projects 81   3. Create a risk management model for: a.
From page 82...
... 82 Transportation System Resilience: Research Roadmap and White Papers 2. Collect a common set of information from states that experienced the same extreme weather event to learn about similarities and differences before, during, and after the event as well as the lessons learned, identified by each state; 3.
From page 83...
... Recommended Roadmap of 2020–2025 Research Projects 83   Objectives: The purpose of this research is to: 1. Develop and promote a unified strategy and common vision of workforce readiness and resilience, 2.
From page 84...
... 84 Transportation System Resilience: Research Roadmap and White Papers operational metrics normally related to system reliability as surrogates to reflect recovery time as a measure of system resilience. Objectives: The purpose of this research is to: 1.
From page 85...
... Recommended Roadmap of 2020–2025 Research Projects 85   activities. The rapid introduction of PNT-dependent connected vehicles into the fleet is exponentially increasing this risk.
From page 86...
... 86 Transportation System Resilience: Research Roadmap and White Papers 3. Identify the optimal content of emergency contracts, and 4.
From page 87...
... Recommended Roadmap of 2020–2025 Research Projects 87   A New Tool Assessing the Value of Resiliency Alternatives by State DOTs Background: Most government risk management programs follow a vulnerability-focused, probabilistic model. These programs primarily consider only the downside aspects of risk, and lack the ability to explicitly consider potential upside opportunities.
From page 88...
... 88 Transportation System Resilience: Research Roadmap and White Papers and state and agency characteristics, and (3) required training and exercises for district personnel, and whether there is a nuclear power plant within the district or in a nearby district; and d.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.