Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 19-30

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 19...
... 19 IntroductIon This is the first of two chapters presenting the results of a survey of transit agencies regarding planning and design for fire and smoke incidents in underground passenger rail systems. The survey was designed to elicit information on: 1.
From page 20...
... 20 One agency noted that it uses NFPA 130 on all new projects but some parts of its system predate the standard. Table 5 shows how agencies use NFPA 130.
From page 21...
... 21 IncIdentS and cauSeS Minor underground fire and smoke incidents are not uncommon, but major incidents occur less often. The survey defined a "major" incident as causing a service disruption of 2 h or more.
From page 22...
... 22 Table 9 shows the primary causes of underground fire and smoke incidents. This was a multiple choice question with multiple responses accepted.
From page 23...
... 23 Most respondents (24 of 26; 92%) report that their agency does not have a fire suppression system onboard transit vehicles that operate in tunnels.
From page 24...
... 24 ventilation to produce an evacuation path free of smoke and a maintenance mode to remove by-products of combustion from maintenance vehicles during nonrevenue hours. Table 13 indicates that ventilation fans typically are controlled remotely.
From page 25...
... 25 A final set of questions in this section asked about if and how agencies change their protocols and procedures as new techniques and regulations emerge, if there are "triggers" to retrofit the system, and if there are work-arounds for legacy systems to meet new requirements. Table 15 indicates that agencies take several different approaches.
From page 26...
... 26 entering the affected area. If the incident is deemed serious enough, passengers will be evacuated.
From page 27...
... 27 Most agencies (16 of 24; 67%) are not aware of recent full-scale tests in which fire size was measured at 52 to 72 Mw in existing vehicles (roughly four times larger than most systems are designed to handle)
From page 28...
... 28 A follow-up question revealed additional elements of agencies' training programs. Ten agencies responded.
From page 29...
... 29 As noted, many agencies rely on NIMS and its Incident Command System (ICS) to establish a chain of command in the field when responding to fire and smoke incidents.
From page 30...
... 30 are the most common elements. More than two-thirds of respondents report that their agency has adopted design standards or codes related to underground fire and smoke prevention and detection.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.